What does a Pre-columbian
Mesoamerican ceramic factory look like?
I don’t have a
very good answer to this question, and I suspect most Mesoamerican
archaeologists would be similarly hard pressed to answer it. Ethnographic
parallels, like the circular subterranean kilns and associated waster dumps of
Coyotepec, Oaxaca, give us some possible models. A few archaeological features,
like the pyrotechnological installations in Belize that Murata (2011) has described
recently, also give us some ideas.
This
question has been at the back of my mind for about thirty years, since I first
started doing research on the production and distribution of Plumbate pottery.
Neutron activation analysis of clays from near the Pacific coastal border
between Mexico and Guatemala seems to have identified the areas where clays for
Plumbate were procured: as shown in Figure 1, the lower Rio Naranjo in
Guatemala has clays that match San Juan Plumbate, and the lower Rio Cahuacan
has clays that match Tohil Plumbate. Within the lower Rio Naranjo area, rumor
has it that Edwin Shook observed the destruction of a Plumbate kiln during road
construction near La Blanca in the 60s or 70s, but he apparently didn’t
photograph the feature, and he never published a description of it.
I have done some
exploration on the Guatemalan side of the border, looking for additional
features like the one Shook observed, but I found no clear evidence of
pyrotechnological features with associated Plumbate waster dumps. Currently,
the Proyecto Arqueológico Costa del Soconusco (PACS) is inventorying
archaeological remains in the mangrove forest on the Mexican side of the
border, where we might expect Tohil workshops to be located. As detailed on
other posts to this blog, many mounds in this area include massive deposits of fired
sediments, which, based on excavation, appear to be related to salt and/or
ceramic production. But we haven’t yet tested any of the mounds west of the Rio
Cahuacan, in the specific area identified as containing Tohil Plumbate clays.
Mounds in the mangrove
forest west of the Cahuacan have large quantities of Plumbate sherds on the
surface together with utilitarian vessels and solid ceramic cylinders that we
believe are pot stands used in sal cocida
salt production. But which of these mounds, if any, might have been sites of
Tohil Plumbate production? The LiDAR imagery generated for the PACS give one
viable and testable hypothesis.
Figure 2 shows the
LiDAR imagery from the area just west of the Rio Cahuacan. I have visited many
of the “CONQ” mounds and many of the “PIN” mounds, where I observed the Plumbate,
salt production, and firing features discussed above and elsewhere on this
blog. I have not yet had the opportunity, however, to visit the “CAH” mounds
located in the southeast corner of the image. The complex consisting of Mounds
CAH-12 through CAH-17 sits almost exactly on the peak of the probability
surface shown in Figure 1, some features of this complex and its environs lead
me to wonder if this is a Tohil Plumbate factory.
Figure
3 zooms in on the CAH-12 complex. The labeled mounds and several smaller ones
form a complex on what appears to be a slight rise on the dry land that forms
the inland edge of the mangrove swamp at this location. Perhaps most
tantalizing, there is one large depression and three smaller ones located
within about 200 meters of the mound complex. The largest depression is almost
100 meters long by 50 meters wide, and approximately one meter deep. Could this
be where Tohil Plumbate potters mined the clay that they formed into serving
vessels for the local market and fancy effigies for the export market? If so,
then Figure 3 would represent an answer to the question posed at the top of
this blog entry.
Currently,
identification of the CAH-12 mound complex as a Plumbate factory is pure
speculation. I will travel back to Soconusco for a couple of weeks this June,
however, at which time I will visit the mound complex and associated
depressions. I will post a brief report of my observations on this blog by the
end of June.